Metropolitan Thames Valley Housing (202015885)
The complaint concerns the landlord’s response to the resident’s request to succeed the tenancy.
We publish decisions as part of our commitment to being open and transparent.
Decision reports do not include residents’ names, but we name landlords. They date from December 2020, and we publish them 3 months after the final decision date.
In some cases, we will not publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest. Or if we will compromise the resident’s anonymity. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
The complaint concerns the landlord’s response to the resident’s request to succeed the tenancy.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of communal heating repairs.
The complaint concerns: The landlord response to the resident’s complaint about being evicted and the provision of a reference. The landlord’s response to reports regarding staff conduct. The landlord’s response to concerns raised about repairs and maintenance. The landlord’s complaint handling.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s application for disability adaptations to his property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of matters in relation to gas safety checks at the property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s report of Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB) from Neighbour A The landlord’s response to the resident’s report of noise related ASB from Neighbour B The landlord’s response to the related complaint.
This complaint is about the landlord’s rent arrears recovery action.
The complaint is about: The landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of antisocial behaviour (ASB). The landlord’s decision not to compensate the resident for the cost of erecting a fence.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of the resident’s anti-social behaviour (“ASB”) reports. The Ombudsman has also considered the landlord’s complaint handling.
The complaints are about the landlord’s: response to concerns that were raised about by the resident about how she had been described within her tenancy file. complaint handling. decision not to remove entries from the resident’s tenancy file.