Ombudsman wider orders show how learning from complaints can help landlords to address regulatory concerns
15 May 2025
Ombudsman wider orders show how learning from complaints can help landlords to address regulatory concerns.

The Housing Ombudsman has published 4 independent reviews that identified weaknesses in handling repairs prior to the landlords later being handed a C3* or C4* judgement by the Regulator of Social Housing.
Lessons include the introduction of a repairs policy, explicit timescales for repairs by third parties, improvements to post-survey approvals and system changes.
The reviews followed investigations into individual complaints where the Ombudsman used its powers to order the landlord to review its policy or practice to prevent the services failures being repeated.
We continue to share learning from our casework to help landlords prevent complaints and improve services. These reviews show how landlords can scrutinise their own performance following a complaint to see if there are any wider issues that may be occurring. Our Centre for Learning provides insight for the landlords, including the Member Responsible for Complaints.
The highlighted landlords are listed below.
Southwark Council (202210574)
A review of cases involving leaks found that the landlord needed to introduce a leaks policy, create mechanisms to assess whether residents are happy with the works carried out, and revise its online repairs portal to speed up the process for residents to report an issue in their home. The review also identified how the landlord could improve post-inspection sign off, improved software and better prioritisation of leaks, damp and mould cases where necessary.
In the case that initiated the wider order, we ordered £17,000 in compensation after the landlord failed to deal with a leak for over 5 years, which left the resident’s home in damp and mould, as well as causing the resident to struggle to cook for their family as their electric cooker had water damage. They said the situation significantly affected the family relationship and their children would often not want to return home.
Southwark Council report (PDF)
Wandsworth Council (202214112)
An independent review into the landlord’s failings in a case involving leaseholders and third parties managing blocks found that there was a need for the landlord to be more explicit about any timelines or communication protocols for reporting, raising, or processing repairs. Any co-ops managing blocks now have a complaints policy that mentions the Housing Ombudsman, and have undertaken training with all staff. It has also procured a new repairs system to real time reporting of issues that wider maintenance staff can access.
The case that initiated this wider order involved a leaseholder complaining about a leak from their roof. The landlord did not take decisive enough action for 4 years or go far enough to put things right for the resident following that length of inconvenience.
Wandsworth Council report (PDF)
Notting Hill Genesis (202225833)
A review into its repairs services due to our wider order led to residents having greater say in the procurement of any new repairs contractor and ability to scrutinise the landlord’s performance in this area. The review has also led to increased strategic oversight on complaints responses, as well as noting the importance of training for staff to roll these changes out effectively. It is now also logging more interactions on its systems to help improve record keeping.
The case that initiated this wider order, the landlord failed to act promptly after a resident reported damp and mould, and unnecessarily prolonged the repairs process, leaving the household living in disrepair for an unreasonable length of time. It also failed to effectively and competently handle the resident’s complaint and delayed this process unnecessarily. Furthermore, the landlord did not take into account any vulnerabilities and the impact that the living conditions could have.
Notting Hill Genesis report (PDF)
Newham Council (202217014)
A review of this case led to the introduction of a repairs policy at the landlord, which it did not have before. This contains information on its key timescales, how it will be holding itself to account on performance, and what is within its remit and what it would expect residents to fix. A Repairs Improvement Plan was also started, and repairs moved from a central function to sitting under housing.
In the case that initiated this wider order, the landlord delayed in resolving leaks and did not offer a temporary move to the resident. This meant she was living with damp and mould, dripping water, and no usable toilet for months. She was also concerned about the impact on her health and about the safety of electrical installations. There was no evidence the landlord carried out a risk assessment and/or assured itself the home was habitable.
Please note that the full Newham Council report is not publicly available.
Richard Blakeway, Housing Ombudsman, said: “Complaints are a valuable tool for landlords as the sector actively seeks to improve services.
“These cases pre-date inspections by the Regulator of Social Housing. While issues identified in inspections will not always be evident in individual complaints, these complaints indicated concerns which were then identified in the inspection.
“The lessons from these independent reviews offer important insights for those landlords as they transform services. It also underscores how complaints can be an early indicator of emerging trends or unresolved issues that the landlord needs to grip.
“We know landlords are doing more to learn from complaints. However, this can still be inconsistent and only in response to our decisions rather than landlords themselves asking if issues could be wider than an individual case.
“Proactive learning from complaints can prevent resident’s experiencing distress, provide intelligence to the landlord on its services and support landlords to deliver outcomes against regulatory expectations.”
In all wider order cases, the Ombudsman invites the landlord to provide a learning statement.
Southwark Council
We apologise unreservedly to our residents who were affected by this leak, and for how we handled their complaint and disrepair claim.
While this case was very complex our service was not good enough and we commissioned an independent, external review which was completed in 2024 and has resulted in a number of recommendations and actions for how we can improve.
We have already put in place actions relating to our repairs processes and more joined-up working. Actions include a new dedicated housing complaints team, improved escalation between repairs and tenancy colleagues, a review of the leaks from above team leading to changes in the structure, and better links between the disrepair team and colleagues dealing with leaks
We are seeing positive results, and will continue to monitor this.
Some of the actions are more wide-ranging relating to our processes and IT systems across the wider council and are being fed into our wider improvement project.
We take this finding seriously, have taken action and continue to make more changes and are committed to learning from this and continuing to improve our services.
Wandsworth Council
We have made significant changes since the issues occurred in this case, and following the determination in July 2024, to prevent the same, or similar issues, from reoccurring we have:
- made staff changes within the area housing team
- delivered training to the council’s o-operatives on complaint handling, communication, and repairs
- undertaken a review of the process in place for co-operatives to report, raise, and process repairs with that updated standardised process shared with them
- acquired a new software application to help programme and deliver annual roof inspections
- introduced a new standing agenda item at the co-operative forum to review complaint outcomes and lessons learned
Notting Hill Genesis
Our handling of the repairs needed to the resident’s home, along with the failures in the subsequent complaints process, were unacceptable and fell below the level of service we aim to provide.
We are acutely aware of the potential dangers of persistent damp and mould and acknowledge that in this case we failed to act for an unreasonable amount of time, which meant we both left the tenant living in an unhealthy and uncomfortable environment, but also broke our own damp and mould policy.
Although this investigation arose from one resident’s case, we were asked to undertake a broader review of our policies and procedures which we welcomed. This wider review has enabled us to make meaningful improvements to our processes that benefit all residents.
This included action to proactively identify and quickly remedy any presence of damp and mould. Beyond that, we have committed £770m through our Better Together strategy to improve the quality of our homes.
We have also introduced a new dedicated complaints department to offer greater independence from the team directly involved, as well as to reduce pressure on local officers and free up more of their time to provide support to their residents.
We are committed to learning from cases where our service fell short and working with the ombudsman to ensure the improvements we introduce make a real difference to our residents.
Newham Council
Our commitment is to ensure safe and quality housing for our residents, addressing any issues promptly, effectively, and with empathy. We sincerely apologise for not meeting our high standards in this case.
We fully acknowledge the Ombudsman’s findings and have complied with all the orders and recommendations issued. We have also completed all works to the property and carried out a post inspection to ensure the completion of work. Additionally, we conducted a thorough service review into the case, including lessons learned which was shared with relevant services.
Following the determination, we published a comprehensive Repairs Policy to enhance the efficiency and transparency of our repair processes. We have also established a proactive strategy to ensure repairs are completed adequately and to a satisfactory standard. This includes:
- a proposed new process will include a post inspection by a surveyor, which will assess the quality of work undertaken. It will also include a further periodic reviews to ensure no further problems are being experienced by the resident
- the business is developing a new case management system that will deliver improved tracking of damp and mould cases, as well as performance data enabling greater insight on the effectiveness of our process
- as part of health and safety training, field operatives have had refresher training to identify any living conditions in the home that may impact on the resident, including their health and safety and to report back to their manager any concerns, so that housing officers can be alerted to investigate
This approach is consistent with the broader Housing Services Improvement Plan that was established following the C4 regulatory judgement in October 2024.
The Housing Ombudsman and the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) have distinct roles within the social housing sector. The Ombudsman is there to investigate individual complaints, strengthen internal complaints procedures and encourage landlords to learn from complaints to prevent service failures being repeated. RSH’s focus is at the landlord level, setting standards which state the outcomes that landlords must deliver. It regulates to ensure a viable, efficient and well governed sector and seeks to drive landlords to improve the quality of the homes and services they deliver. RSH does not have a remit over leaseholders.
In July 2024, RSH and Housing Ombudsman published a new Memorandum of Understanding setting out how the two organisations will continue to work with each other to deliver their respective roles. The MoU reflects the new powers that each organisation received as a result of the Social Housing (Regulation) Act.
*C3 – There are serious failings in the landlord delivering the outcomes of the consumer standards and significant improvement is needed.
*C4 – There are very serious failings in the landlord delivering the outcomes of the consumer standards.