Derby Homes Limited (202125471)
The resident complains about the level of redress offered by the landlord in relation to a fly infestation in his property.
Our decisions are published as part of our commitment to being open and transparent. The decisions are anonymised so residents’ names are not used, but landlords are named. The decisions date from December 2020, and are published 3 months after the final decision date. In some cases, we may decide not to publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest or the resident’s anonymity may be compromised. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
The resident complains about the level of redress offered by the landlord in relation to a fly infestation in his property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of enquiries concerning the resident’s contents insurance policy.
The resident has complained about: The landlord’s response to reports of ASB and counter allegations. The landlord’s handling of his concerns about staff conduct.
This complaint is about the landlord’s handling of the resident’s concerns about charges for use of an electrical vehicle charging point.
The complaint is about the landlord's handling of repairs to the external rendering of the resident’s property.
The complaint is about: The landlord’s handling of the resident’s reports of a leak into his property. The landlord’s complaints handling.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of the resident’s concerns about the condition, safety and security of her garden when she moved into her property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of the resident’s report of pests in her home.
The complaint is about: The landlord’s response to the resident’s report of potholes in the communal carpark. The landlord’s complaint handling.
The resident’s complaint is about major works carried out at the resident’s building, specifically: The landlord has failed to fulfil its obligations under Sections 19 and 20 of the Landlord Tenant Act. The scope of the repairs expended after work began and the landlord did not carry out further consultations. The resulting costs for major works are not reasonable and cannot legally be recharged to leaseholders.