Decisions

We publish decisions as part of our commitment to being open and transparent.

Decision reports do not include residents’ names, but we name landlords. They date from December 2020, and we publish them 3 months after the final decision date.

In some cases, we will not publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest. Or if we will compromise the resident’s anonymity. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.

Loading...

Haringey London Borough Council (202112349)

The complaint is about: The landlord’s response to a leak that occurred during works to the resident’s kitchen. The landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of damage to her belongings. The landlord’s response to the original works to the kitchen. The landlord’s associated complaint handling.

Leeds City Council (202101525)

The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports regarding the structural integrity of his property.

One Housing Group Limited (202014714)

The complaint is about the landlord’s: response to the resident’s request for information relating to the service charge accounts. communication regarding the service charge accounts, and its handling of the formal complaint.

Orbit Housing Association Limited (201909362)

The resident has complained about the landlord’s handling of her reports of damp and mould within her property and the subsequent damage it has caused. The Ombudsman has also considered the landlord’s complaint handling.

Peabody Trust (202102946)

The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s report about an unauthorised structure. The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s report about the estate inspections. The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s request regarding CCTV footage.

Southern Housing Group Limited (202006100)

The complaint is about the landlord’s: implementation of its unacceptable behaviour policy to restrict the resident’s contact; response to the resident’s requests for support; complaint handling, including; refusal to consider the resident’s disrepair claim under its complaints policy; delays to its responses. The complaint is also about the landlord’s: call handlers not answering the resident’s calls; call handler showing bias against the resident; call handlers not being trained to communicate with people with autism.