Runnymede Borough Council (202102366)
This complaint is about the landlord's decision to refuse the resident’s request for a stairlift in her property.
We publish decisions as part of our commitment to being open and transparent.
Decision reports do not include residents’ names, but we name landlords. They date from December 2020, and we publish them 3 months after the final decision date.
In some cases, we will not publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest. Or if we will compromise the resident’s anonymity. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
This complaint is about the landlord's decision to refuse the resident’s request for a stairlift in her property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s: Handling of the residents’ reports of anti-social behaviour (ASB) including noise nuisance. Handling of the residents’ request for a management move.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of the resident’s reports of an operative causing damage to his property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of a request for a replacement kitchen. The Ombudsman has also considered the landlord’s handling of the complaint.
The complaint is about: The landlord’s handling of the resident’s reports that a communal pipe was leaking into her bathroom. The landlord’s handling of the associated complaint.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of antisocial behaviour (ASB) by a neighbour.
This complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s request for information about his service charges, and its handling of his subsequent complaint.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of the resident’s Right to Buy (RTB) application, including the valuation of the property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of: The resident’s request to extend her tenancy. The associated complaint.
The complaint is regarding: The landlord’s handling of the resident’s management transfer request. The landlord’s handling of the resident’s complaint and the level of compensation offered. The Ombudsman has also considered the landlord’s record keeping in this case.