We publish decisions as part of our commitment to being open and transparent.
Decision reports do not include residents’ names, but we name landlords. They date from December 2020, and we publish them 3 months after the final decision date.
In some cases, we will not publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest. Or if we will compromise the resident’s anonymity. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
Decision Case ID 202516158 Decision type Investigation Landlord London & Quadrant Housing Trust Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Tenancy Date 19 February 2026 Background The resident lives in the property, a 2-bedroom maisonette […]
Decision Case ID 202320005 Decision type Investigation Landlord London Borough of Camden Council Landlord type Local Authority / ALMO or TMO Occupancy Secure Tenancy Date 19 February 2026 Background The resident reported concerns with […]
Decision Case ID 202331345 Decision type Investigation Landlord London Borough of Lambeth Landlord type Local Authority / ALMO or TMO Occupancy Secure Tenancy Date 19 February 2026 Background The resident reported a communal […]
Decision Case ID 202525203 Decision type Investigation Landlord Newlon Housing Trust Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Tenancy Date 19 February 2026 Background The resident moved into her property by mutual exchange. She complained […]
The landlord responded to the resident’s complaint in line with its policies and our Complaint Handling Code (the Code).
Decision Case ID 202442815 Decision type Investigation Landlord One Housing Group Limited Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Shared Ownership Date 19 February 2026 Background The resident pays a variable service charge. On 21 August […]
Decision Case ID 202408415 Decision type Investigation Landlord Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council Landlord type Local Authority / ALMO or TMO Occupancy Secure Tenancy Date 19 February 2026 Background The resident lives in a high […]
The landlord met its response timescale at stage 1. Its stage 2 response was issued one day outside its stated timescale. This was a minimal delay, and there is no evidence that it caused any disadvantage to the resident. On that basis, the delay does not amount to a complaint‑handling shortcoming.
Decision Case ID 202424991 Decision type Investigation Landlord Stonewater Limited Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Leaseholder Date 19 February 2026 Background The resident lived in a flat within a block of 4 flats which has […]
Decision Case ID 202345463 Decision type Investigation Landlord Amplius Living Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Shared Ownership Date 18 February 2026 Background The resident received a letter in September 2023 about service charges […]