Our decisions are published as part of our commitment to being open and transparent. The decisions are anonymised so residents’ names are not used, but landlords are named. The decisions date from December 2020, and are published 3 months after the final decision date. In some cases, we may decide not to publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest or the resident’s anonymity may be compromised. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
This complaint is about the landlord’s handling of: the resident’s reports that the property had not met lettable standards; the resident’s reports of repairs needed to her property; kitchen upgrade works; the resident’s requests for it to consider her circumstances and offer appropriate support.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s request for it to redecorate, following damage caused by a leak from the roof.
The complaint is about: the advice given to the resident concerning the Home Choice Scheme. how the landlord handled the resident’s reports of ASB including how staff communicated with her.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of rodents in her property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of the resident’s reports of Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB).
REPORT COMPLAINT 202013847 Midland Heart Limited 10 June 2021 Our approach The Housing Ombudsman’s approach to investigating and determining complaints is to decide what is fair in all the circumstances of the case. This is […]
The complaint refers to: The landlord’s handling of the major adaptations to the resident’s property. The resident’s concerns about delays caused by the local authority and its appointed contractor in completing the adaptations.
The complaints are about the landlord’s:
The complaint is about the level of compensation offered by the landlord’s insurer in relation to the resident’s claim for property damage and loss of rental income following a leak from a neighbouring property.
The complaint is about: The level and reasonableness of the service charges paid by the resident. The landlord’s response to the resident’s queries regarding service charges. The landlord’s response to the resident’s request for information concerning cladding on the building which the property is situated in, including the production of form EWS1. The landlord’s complaint handling.