We publish decisions as part of our commitment to being open and transparent.
Decision reports do not include residents’ names, but we name landlords. They date from December 2020, and we publish them 3 months after the final decision date.
In some cases, we will not publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest. Or if we will compromise the resident’s anonymity. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
Decision Case ID 202231468 Decision type Investigation Landlord Metropolitan Thames Valley Housing (MTV) Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Tenancy Date 19 December 2025 Background The resident reported several outstanding repairs at her property […]
Decision Case ID 202415087 Decision type Investigation Landlord Metropolitan Thames Valley Housing (MTV) Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Tenancy Date 19 December 2025 Background The resident viewed the property, a 3-bedroom maisonette, on […]
Decision Case ID 202516544 Decision type Investigation Landlord Moat Homes Limited Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Tenancy Date 19 December 2025 Background The resident contacted the landlord in October 2024 to report anti-social behaviour […]
Decision Case ID 202318586 Decision type Investigation Landlord Muir Group Housing Association Limited Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Shorthold Tenancy Date 19 December 2025 Background The resident reported damp and mould concerns to the […]
Decision Case ID 202415395 Decision type Investigation Landlord North West Leicestershire District Council Landlord type Local Authority / ALMO or TMO Occupancy Secure Tenancy Date 19 December 2025 Background The resident lives in a […]
Decision Case ID 202414212 Decision type Investigation Landlord Notting Hill Genesis Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Tenancy Date 19 December 2025 Background The resident was unhappy with how the landlord responded to her […]
The landlord acknowledged its failures in response to the complaint. In line with its policy at the time, the current housing officer should not have responded at stage 1. However, we have not identified any detriment or overall impact caused. The compensation offer was appropriate and was enough to satisfactorily resolve the failures related to the handling of the complaint.
Decision Case ID 202510180 Decision type Investigation Landlord Notting Hill Genesis Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Tenancy Date 19 December 2025 Background Following reports of roof leaks affecting her property, the landlord carried out […]
Decision Case ID 202404408 Decision type Investigation Landlord Nottingham City Council Landlord type Local Authority Occupancy Secure Tenancy Date 19 December 2025 Background The resident is a secure tenant of a 3-bedroom house. She […]
Decision Case ID 202400318 Decision type Investigation Landlord One Housing Group Limited Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Shorthold Tenancy Date 19 December 2025 Background The property is a flat in a block with a […]