Southwark Council (202016835)
REPORT
COMPLAINT 202016835
Southwark Council
3 February 2022
Our approach
What we can and cannot consider is called the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction and is governed by the Housing Ombudsman Scheme. The Ombudsman must determine whether a complaint comes within their jurisdiction. The Ombudsman seeks to resolve disputes wherever possible but cannot investigate complaints that fall outside of this.
In deciding whether a complaint falls within their jurisdiction, the Ombudsman will carefully consider all the evidence provided by the parties and the circumstances of the case.
The complaint
- The complaint concerns the landlord’s response to reports of:
a) Damp and mould
b) An infestation of mice
c) Excessive cold
Determination (jurisdictional decision)
- When a complaint is brought to the Ombudsman, we must consider all the circumstances of the case as there are sometimes reasons why a complaint will not be investigated.
- After carefully considering all the evidence, I have determined that the complaint, as set out above, is not within the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction.
Summary of events
- The resident raised a complaint stating that she had reported excessive cold in the property which in her opinion had resulted in damp and mould. In addition, the resident explained that she has experienced a mouse infestation. The resident detailed that she has young children and as such, she found the landlord’s inaction concerning.
- The landlord explained on 8 June 2021 that because the resident had initiated legal proceedings, that it would not issue a stage two response to the complaint. The landlord directed the resident to its complaints procedure and provided details for the resident to contact this service.
- The resident brought their complaint to this Service explaining that the property was in a state of disrepair. The resident stated that the situation was having an impact on the wellbeing of the family.
- This Service has seen no evidence to show that the resident pursued the matter further as a complaint with the landlord. We understand that, instead, the resident submitted a claim to the Magistrates’ court.
- The landlord confirmed to the Service that the resident had initiated proceedings with the Magistrates’ Court in March 2021, with a consent order being issued on 2 November 2021. The landlord provided correspondence it had received from the Court.
Reasons
- The Housing Ombudsman Scheme states that:
The Ombudsman will not investigate complaints which, in the Ombudsman’s opinion:
39 (a) – are made prior to having exhausted a member’s complaints procedure, unless there is evidence of a complaint handling failure and the Ombudsman is satisfied that the member has not taken action within a reasonable timescale;
39 (h) – which concern matters that are, or have been, the subject of legal proceedings and where a complainant has or had the opportunity to raise the subject matter of the complaint as part of those proceedings;
- This Service can only investigate complaints which have exhausted a landlord’s complaint procedure, and which were brought to this Service within six months of the landlord’s final decision.
- In this case, the resident had the opportunity to escalate their complaint to stage two of the landlord’s complaint process but chose instead to proceed with a claim to courts. The complaint has not exhausted the landlord’s complaint procedure; therefore, the Ombudsman cannot investigate it.
- Furthermore, the complaint is being considered by the Magistrates Court.
- This Service cannot consider a complaint which is the subject of legal proceedings. Therefore, in accordance with paragraph 39(h) this is not a complaint that the Ombudsman can investigate further.
- I am therefore satisfied that this is not a complaint which the Ombudsman can investigate further.
- If the resident remains dissatisfied with this issue, they may wish to seek further advice, the following organisations may be of use.