We publish decisions as part of our commitment to being open and transparent.
Decision reports do not include residents’ names, but we name landlords. They date from December 2020, and we publish them 3 months after the final decision date.
In some cases, we will not publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest. Or if we will compromise the resident’s anonymity. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
The complaint is about: The landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of a faulty window. The landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of water penetration to the property. The landlord’s handling of the complaint.
This complaint is about the resident’s former landlord’s handling her reports of Anti-social Behaviour (ASB) by her neighbour (Ms Y) prior to her tenancy being transferred to a different social housing landlord on 13 May 2019.
The complaint is about the landlord’s decision not to compensate the resident for works he said he carried out to the kitchen, at his own expense, due to the poor quality of workmanship of the landlord.
The complaint is about the quality of home repairs and renovations, staff conduct, and the outcome of the resident’s insurance claim.
The complaint concerns: the landlord’s handling of the resident’s eviction. the landlord’s complaint handling. the landlord’s response to concerns raised by the resident that were not addressed as a formal complaint through the landlord’s complaints procedure.
The complaint is about the landlord’s:
This complaint is about the landlord’s handling of: the resident’s reports of repairs needed to her kitchen; the resident’s reports of asbestos in the block; the resident’s reports of faulty radiators; the resident’s reports of anti-social behaviour (ASB); the resident’s staff conduct complaint.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of reports of noise transference from a neighbouring property.
The complaint concerns: The landlord’s response to reports of a water leak into the resident’s property. The landlord’s refusal to provide the resident with detailed information concerning the source of the leak and what repairs it undertook to resolve the issue. The landlord’s decision to only consider events 12 months prior to the date when the complaint was raised when addressing the complaint.
The complaint is about the landlord’s: Response to the resident’s concerns that it should not have allowed the mutual exchange to go ahead due to the condition of the property. Response to the resident’s repair requests. Complaint handling. The Ombudsman’s has also considered the landlord’s record keeping as part of the assessment.