Poole Housing Partnership Ltd (202013157)
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s enquiries about the use and allocation of the sheds on his estate.
We publish decisions as part of our commitment to being open and transparent.
Decision reports do not include residents’ names, but we name landlords. They date from December 2020, and we publish them 3 months after the final decision date.
In some cases, we will not publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest. Or if we will compromise the resident’s anonymity. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s enquiries about the use and allocation of the sheds on his estate.
REPORT COMPLAINT 202101926 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea June 2021 Our approach The Housing Ombudsman’s approach to investigating and determining complaints is to decide what is fair in all the circumstances of the […]
The complaint refers to: The landlord’s handling of a reported leak into the resident’s property. The level of compensation offered by the landlord following the leak.
The complaint concerns the landlord’s: Handling of repairs following a leak from a radiator. Decision not to replace the living room flooring damaged by the leak. Insurance provider declining the resident’s request for compensation for damage to her possessions caused by the leak.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of damage to her car window.
The complaint refers to: The landlord’s handling of the resident’s reports of antisocial behaviour and noise nuisance.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of reports of a leak in the bathroom at the property.
The complaint concerns: The landlord’s handling of outstanding defects at the property. Breaches of data protection regulations by the landlord. The condition of the wiring in the property.
This complaint is about the managing agent’s response to the resident’s request that his Thames Water, Watersure Plus, discount be backdated to 2015.
The resident has complained about the following issues: That service charges for maintaining and operating a door entry system are too high. That the landlord cannot, or should not, recharge her for the full cost of this item.