Newlon Housing Trust (202528897)
|
Case ID |
202528897 |
|
Decision type |
Investigation |
|
Landlord |
Newlon Housing Trust |
|
Landlord type |
Housing Association |
|
Occupancy |
Applicant |
|
Date |
12 May 2026 |
- The applicant applied to buy a shared ownership property. The landlord refused the application on financial grounds. The applicant then submitted another application to buy a different property, which the landlord also refused due to financial concerns and “inconsistent” financial information. The resident was unhappy about the landlord’s decisions and said that he felt he had been accused of being dishonest.
What the complaint is about
- The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of applications to buy a shared ownership property.
- We have also considered the landlord’s complaint handling.
Our decision (determination)
- There was no maladministration in the landlord’s handling of applications to buy a shared property.
- There was service failure in the landlord’s complaint handling.
We have made orders for the landlord to put things right.
Reasons
The landlord’s handling of applications to buy a shared ownership property
- The landlord’s website provides information about the process to buy a shared ownership property. It states that applicants must be assessed by one of its independent financial advisors. This is common practice when applying to buy a property.
- The landlord’s independent financial advisor refused the applicant both times he applied. It was reasonable for the landlord to follow the advice of a qualified professional. We further note that the landlord would not have had the power to overrule this decision, as it related to the applicant’s borrowing capacity. Therefore the landlord acted in line with its policies when it rejected the applications.
Complaint handling
- The landlord has a 2-stage complaints process. Its policy states it will issue a full response within 10 working days for stage 1 complaints and within 20 working days for stage 2 complaints. These timescales align with our statutory Complaint Handling Code.
- In its stage 1 response the landlord awarded £25 compensation for its delay in acknowledging the applicant’s complaint. This was reasonable and in line with its complaints policy.
- The landlord’s complaint responses were heavy-handed. In his escalation request the applicant provided a reasonable explanation of how the discrepancies in his applications had occurred. However, in its stage 2 response, the landlord stated that the applicant’s application was “concerning” and he was “trying to fit the criteria”. These accusations were unnecessary and caused the applicant avoidable distress.
Putting things right
Where we find service failure, maladministration or severe maladministration we can make orders for the landlord to put things right. We have the discretion to make recommendations in all other cases within our jurisdiction.
Orders
Landlords must comply with our orders in the manner and timescales we specify. The landlord must provide documentary evidence of compliance with our orders by the due date set.
|
Order |
What the landlord must do |
Due date |
|
1 |
Apology order The landlord must apologise in writing to the applicant for the complaint handling failures identified in this report. The landlord must ensure:
|
No later than 10 June 2026 |
|
2 |
Compensation order The landlord must pay the applicant £100 made up as follows:
This must be paid directly to the applicant by the due date. The landlord must provide documentary evidence of payment by the due date. The landlord may deduct from the total figure any payments it has already paid. |
No later than: 10 June 2026 |
Recommendations
Our recommendations are not binding, and a landlord may decide not to follow them.
|
Our recommendations |
|
The landlord should consider how it communicates with applicants and residents during its complaints process. Our spotlight report on attitudes, respect and rights highlights the importance of empathy and use of tone to support positive communication. |